Study Your History
Winston Churchill said, “Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” I believe that. I also believe this: Those who fail to learn from history do so because they never learned their history! Most citizens have no idea that today’s government doesn’t even faintly resemble the government our founders set up. Their vision was never a huge, over-reaching centralized federal government. To the contrary...
Winston Churchill said, “Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” I believe that. I also believe this: Those who fail to learn from history do so because they never learned their history! Most citizens have no idea that today’s government doesn’t even faintly resemble the government our founders set up. Their vision was never a huge, over-reaching centralized federal government. To the contrary...
Thomas Jefferson said: “I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground: that “all powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states or to the people... To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition. The capital and leading object of the Constitution was to leave with the states all authorities which respected their own citizens only, and to transfer to the United States those which respected citizens of foreign or other states....Can any good be effected by taking from the states the moral rule of their citizens and subordinating it to the general [federal] authority?...Such an intention was impossible and...[would] break up the foundations of the Union.... I believe the states can best govern our home concerns, and the general [federal] government our foreign ones. I wish, therefore...never to see all offices transferred to Washington, where, further withdrawn from the eyes of the people, they may more secretly be bought and sold as at market. Our country is too large to have all its affairs directed by a single [federal] government. Public servants at such a distance, and from under the eye of their constituents, must, from the circumstance of distance, be unable to administer and overlook all the details necessary for the good government of the citizens and...will invite the public agents to corruption, plunder, and waste.”
James Madison agreed with Jefferson. In 1792, when it was proposed the federal government bailout a failing industry and prop it up with federal subsidies , he condemned the measure, saying: “Those who proposed the Constitution conceived [i.e., believed]… (and those who ratified the Constitution conceived) that this is not an indefinite [unrestricted] government…but a limited government tied down to the specified powers….It was never…supposed or suspected that the old Congress could give away the money of the states to bounties to encourage agriculture, or for any other purpose they pleased.” Madison warned that if federal government wasn’t kept limited, it would soon usurp state jurisdictions: “If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the ‘general welfare’, and are the sole and supreme judges of the ‘general welfare’, [then Congress might] take the care of religion into their own hands; they may appoint teachers in every state, county, and parish and pay them out of their public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, establishing in like manner schools throughout the union; they may assume the provision for the poor; they may undertake the regulation of all roads...; in short, everything from the highest object of state legislation down to the most minute object of police would be thrown under the power of [the federal] Congress.”